Search This Blog

Friday, March 23, 2018

A Multi-Polar New World Order Competing Systems, 4 Systems Struggling to Be the World's New Order, China, Russia, USA and the EU and Islamic (Sunni and Shiite)

There is no new world order, but competing world orders that have forgotten why there is a United Nations, in which it forgot the League of Nations in 1919 and was never well established and now the same thing is happening. The United Nations prevented the Cold War of becoming a World War 3, because of the remembrance of World War 2.

The world must come together as a democracy through the United Nations. A democracy is not defined as a system but as a majority system that the people elect that is the government accordingly. These systems can compete in dialogue through the United Nations or a world assembly, a federation, over-riding imperialistic, religious governance, communistic endeavors.

China is a socialist capitalistic system. The problem lies in that it is a system held up by capitalism monetarily, for the money is in the south and a monopolized communist party in Beijing. All the money is in Shanghai and Hong Kong. What if there was an election, allowing all political systems to grow with the communist party through political competition.

Russia is a oligarchical crony type capitalism. The Russians seem to be OK with it, and great, if that is what the Russian people want. Russia got messed over, after the Cold War and was not respected like it should be, as the West did in the Treaty of Versailles that caused Germany to backlash with Nazism. That is a Western flaw in making a better world. I admit, I am on two social sites that are Russian and I am starting to understand the plight that the west puts upon them.

The USA and the EU see a world of them still being in leadership, which go against the other systems. Again for the self interest of the West and not the rest of the world as the world see a different attempted type of colonialism or western imperialism. Again, democratic systems come in many types, but basically it is a majority that creates what kind of system that is.

The fourth on is seen in the form of an Islamic globalization, in which Islam is mixed with governments. Religion was never meant to be part of a governmental system. In this, two parts are competing, it being Sunni and Shiite, with Russia and the USA bidding on each side. So goes the competition in the Middle East with the main players being Saudi Arabia and Iran.

The world order that must happen though, is a United Nations assembly of world powers coming together to solve world problems. Wars and conflicts could be solved by coalition forces in the surrounding regions. Geopolitical problems could be solved the same way with the United Nations being the mediator of the solving process.

In a world where it is interconnected through the Internet, import and exports open border transportation, air and sea routes through free trade. Multicultural exchanges through open borders and open society. Reasoning and logical negotiations with one another in this United Nations organizations.But this should be in sync with population representation in the United Nations and not by the monetary influence of any one national representation within the United Nations. In conclusion, this would be more of a middle ground instead of the 4 power broking systems mentioned.

No comments: