Monday, June 18, 2018
World Web Traffic By Country
Nigeria: 81%
India: 79%
Indonesia: 72%
South Africa: 71%
Saudi: 64%
Turkey: 62%
China: 61%
South Korea: 47%
US: 41%
Mexico: 40%
UK: 38%
Germany: 37%
France: 34%
Brazil: 32%
Japan: 27%
Russia: 21%
Treaty of Versailles and Not Joining the League of Nations Started World War 2, The Prelude to World War 2
After World War I, the U.S. rejected the Treaty of Versailles and did not join the League of Nations.
In 1920, the manufacture, sale, import, and export of alcohol were prohibited by an amendment to the United States Constitution. Possession of liquor, and drinking it, was never illegal. The overall level of alcohol consumption did go down, however, state and local governments avoided aggressive enforcement. The federal government was overwhelmed with cases so that bootlegging and speakeasies flourished in every city, and well-organized criminal gangs exploded in numbers, finances, power, and influence on city politics.
During most of the 1920s, the United States enjoyed a period of sustained prosperity. Agriculture went through a bubble in soaring land prices that collapsed in 1921, and that sector remained depressed. Coal mining was shrinking as oil became the main energy source. Otherwise, most sectors prospered. Prices were stable, and the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew steadily until 1929 when the financial bubble burst.
In foreign policy President Wilson helped found the League of Nations but the U.S. never joined it, as the Congress was reluctant to give up its constitutional role in declaring war. The nation instead took the initiative to disarm the world, most notably at the Washington Conference in 1921–22. Washington also stabilized the European economy through the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan. The Immigration Act of 1924 was aimed at stabilizing the traditional ethnic balance and strictly limiting the total inflow. The act completely blocked Asian immigrants, providing no means for them to get in.
The Wall Street Crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression led to government efforts to restart the economy and help its victims. The recovery, however, was very slow. The nadir of the Great Depression was 1933, and recovery was rapid until the recession of 1938 proved a setback. There were no major new industries in the 1930s that were big enough to drive growth the way autos, electricity and construction had been so powerful in the 1920s. GDP surpassed 1929 levels in 1940.
Sunday, June 17, 2018
Saturday, June 16, 2018
Friday, June 15, 2018
Thursday, June 14, 2018
Nationalism, Racism, Gangs, Tribalism, We're All Related, Be Yourself and Not a Follower
It comes not just in the color black. Down through history, it has happened to almost every ethnic background. Crazy thing, if you are a Christian, we are all related. There are black nationalist, white nationalist, Japanese nationalist. the keyword here is that if you belonged to an ethnic gang, a church that has all black, all white congregations if you hang around one color or glorify just yours, then you might be a nationalist. So to reboot the brain, take an ethnic DNA test, and then do some ethnic soul searching. Shooting from the hip is always easier anyway, but it shows the lazy ignorance of human beings. I guess this explains the tribal mentality of world politics today, but then again, nationalism in any form is what caused 2 world wars. Think about it, use logic, reason, research, analysis, be independent in your thoughts and calculation, and judge from that to draw your conclusions, guess that is why they call it prejudice.
Fascism Defined by VP Wallace in 1944, Mirrors the Warning Signs of Today
A fascist is one whose lust for money or power is combined with such an intensity of intolerance toward those of other races, parties, classes, religions, cultures, regions or nations as to make him ruthless in his use of deceit or violence to attain his ends. The supreme god of a fascist, to which his ends are directed, may be money or power;may be a race or a class; may be a military, clique or an economicgroup; or may be a culture, religion, or a political party.
The dangerous American fascist is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.
...
If we define an American fascist as one who in case of conflict puts money and power ahead of human beings, then there are undoubtedly several million fascists in the United States. There are probably several hundred thousand if we narrow the definition to include only those who in their search for money and power are ruthless and deceitful. Most American fascists are enthusiastically supporting the war effort.
Henry Wallace: VP to President Roosevelt.
The dangerous American fascist is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.
...
If we define an American fascist as one who in case of conflict puts money and power ahead of human beings, then there are undoubtedly several million fascists in the United States. There are probably several hundred thousand if we narrow the definition to include only those who in their search for money and power are ruthless and deceitful. Most American fascists are enthusiastically supporting the war effort.
Henry Wallace: VP to President Roosevelt.
Wednesday, June 13, 2018
Tuesday, June 12, 2018
Global Elites, Drug War, Oil and Gas, War is a Racket, Church is a Tax Free Business, Supply and Demand Driving Up Cost, Create Shortages in the Markets, Religion and Government Do Not Mix
Rich industrialists wanted to start an economic war and Putin says, fine,.. you want to play games with our lives? I will invest in shill mongering psy-ops to cause more divisiveness throughout your population thereby encouraging homegrown terrorism in your country... The rich industrialists say,... yeah we thought you might do that... it's cool, we planned to enslave half the world's population through taxation and other means in order to protect our military industrial complex. You know, we already monetize the war on drugs perpetually so more homegrown terrorism and school shootings are just good for business... you're doing us a favor; "smart guy". Oh and btw, we don't really care what country this happens in,.. they are pig pens for our cattle; not like we live actually live there. Then they put their pinkies up to the side of their mouths. Putin: Hey TR, how do you know I don't have investments in the military industrial complex and I want all of this to happen also? I am a military man after all. Then I laugh at all of these primitives but they don't realize that very they WILL "die" someday, transmute back into our food source, then transmute back into the very slaves and become the lambs to the slaughter.... over and over again for many generations to come... thought you were going to one-up me, Putin,,? You industrialists thought you were smart? Do you even science bro's? Dr. BrainTickler in da house!
Additive in this supporting statement post sent to me.
We have different sides helping opposite ends of a war spectrum. Russia supporting the Shiites, Iran, Syrian Army. The USA and NATO powers supporting the fight against ISIS, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Sunni powers. Basically, it is a Shiite and Sunni regional conflict. It is over oil, pipelines, and influences of these two religions. But you have to come to the realization that all these conflicts sell weapons. The USA is the number one producer and Russia being number two. Neither wants a war with each other, for it would be a losing scenario. So proxy wars are better in a sense they keep the military complex of both countries pumping out weapons sales. Not only this not less forget access to mineral deposits in these regions and opium.
By bombing these countries, we create and manufacture more terrorist recruits and more splinter groups are born from the conflicts. To in point, you can see with Islam, why religion does not mix with the government even being a radical one at that. Not to say that we do not have a radical Christian sect ourselves in the USA, called evangelicalism.
The war on drugs is another racket to keep the prices high, as is oil. Supply and demand with prohibition laws to create black markets and keep the prices high. The reason for us being in Afghanistan and with oil, creating conflicts in the Middle East to keep natural gas and oil prices high. Not only this, religion plays a big part, for that saying, a tax-free industry that prospers and is influential in politics. In Islam's case, government influence and the USA heading that way with the right wing religious evangelicals creating a new human conversion market for themselves.
If you really think about it, the Russian mob could play a part in this aspect with crony business opportunity and the drug trade in opium. England had a big lucrative business with opium in the 19th century, which led to a lot of wars. Not to mention, lithium deposits in Afghanistan are told to be big by geologist surveyors.
Additive in this supporting statement post sent to me.
We have different sides helping opposite ends of a war spectrum. Russia supporting the Shiites, Iran, Syrian Army. The USA and NATO powers supporting the fight against ISIS, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Sunni powers. Basically, it is a Shiite and Sunni regional conflict. It is over oil, pipelines, and influences of these two religions. But you have to come to the realization that all these conflicts sell weapons. The USA is the number one producer and Russia being number two. Neither wants a war with each other, for it would be a losing scenario. So proxy wars are better in a sense they keep the military complex of both countries pumping out weapons sales. Not only this not less forget access to mineral deposits in these regions and opium.
By bombing these countries, we create and manufacture more terrorist recruits and more splinter groups are born from the conflicts. To in point, you can see with Islam, why religion does not mix with the government even being a radical one at that. Not to say that we do not have a radical Christian sect ourselves in the USA, called evangelicalism.
The war on drugs is another racket to keep the prices high, as is oil. Supply and demand with prohibition laws to create black markets and keep the prices high. The reason for us being in Afghanistan and with oil, creating conflicts in the Middle East to keep natural gas and oil prices high. Not only this, religion plays a big part, for that saying, a tax-free industry that prospers and is influential in politics. In Islam's case, government influence and the USA heading that way with the right wing religious evangelicals creating a new human conversion market for themselves.
If you really think about it, the Russian mob could play a part in this aspect with crony business opportunity and the drug trade in opium. England had a big lucrative business with opium in the 19th century, which led to a lot of wars. Not to mention, lithium deposits in Afghanistan are told to be big by geologist surveyors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)